[Openid-specs-ab] Conformance test features grouped by category

[Torsten Lodderstedt]

Hi Mike,

I just took a quick onto the criteria for the basic conformance profile. 
It looks good from my perspective.

I think "ID Token has kid claim" should be "y unless only uses none" as 
this claim is apparently not needed for "none".

This criterion also raised a question: Making existence of "kid" a 
conformance criterion means making it a mandatory to implement feature. 
Is the kid header parameter mandatory in JWS, JWT, or OpenID Connect? I 
didn't find any text about that. I'm not against this criterion, but 
probably text in one of the before mentioned specs should probably be 
enhanced a bit.

kind regards,
Torsten.

Am 06.11.2014 18:11, schrieb Mike Jones:
>
> The attached version contains updates resulting from the discussion on 
> today's call.
>
> -- Mike
>
> *From:*Openid-specs-ab 
> [mailto:openid-specs-ab-bounces at lists.openid.net] *On Behalf Of *Mike 
> Jones
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 04, 2014 11:39 PM
> *To:* roland.hedberg at umu.se
> *Cc:* openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net; Don Thibeau
> *Subject:* [Openid-specs-ab] Conformance test features grouped by category
>
> Hi Roland and working group,
>
> Please review the conformance test features, which are now grouped 
> into logical categories. Particular, if you think we're missing 
> features that should be tested, please let us know what they are.
>
> Note that there are both OP and RP tabs in the spreadsheet.
>
> Thanks all,
>
> -- Mike
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openid-specs-ab mailing list
> Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-ab/attachments/20141109/251865f1/attachment.html>