[Openid-specs-ab] Session Management discussion at EIC.

Nat Sakimura sakimura at gmail.com
Tue May 13 10:49:05 UTC 2014


Session Management discussion at EIC.



The "Note Well" was sited before starting the session at 12:15.

Mike explained the pros and cons of the three approaches:

#1.   postMessage 0

#2.   image/iframe GETs 8

#3.   backchannel 11

Then, wento on to ask the questions to the room:



Q1. If you have only one of the below, which one would you choose?

#1.   postMessage 0

#2.   image/iframe GETs 8

#3.   backchannel 11



Reasons for preferring #3 : Backchannel:

l  Only the mechanism to guarantee the logout.

l  Session sync between IdP and SP possible only in this.

l  Can administratively logout users from SP.



Reasons for preferring #2: image/iframe GETs.

l  Cheapest option. Backchannel requires change in the SPs, and implement
it correctly can be hard.



To find out why there were nobody who preferred #1, John Bradley asked the
room:



Q. Is there anybody who supports AJAX client?

Only 1.



Then, it was pointed out from the floor that approach #1 requires all the
clients to have the code and excludes the possibility of having another
security layer such as a proxy.



One "Con" of the Backchannel method was sited after the session was over:

If the SP is not directly reachable from the IdP, it does not work.


-- 
Nat Sakimura (=nat)
Chairman, OpenID Foundation
http://nat.sakimura.org/
@_nat_en
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-ab/attachments/20140513/86c9e0eb/attachment.html>


More information about the Openid-specs-ab mailing list