[Openid-specs-ab] Spec call notes 5-Sep-13
Nat Sakimura
sakimura at gmail.com
Fri Sep 6 04:28:54 UTC 2013
Combined spec is up in the same blog page as partitioned ones now.
Please review.
Nat
Sep 6, 2013 0:01、Mike Jones <Michael.Jones at microsoft.com> のメッセージ:
> Spec call notes 5-Sep-13
>
> Nat Sakimura
> Mike Jones
> George Fletcher
> John Bradley
> Tony Nadalin
> Justin Richer
> Edmund Jay
>
> Agenda:
> Pre-IIW Meeting
> Possible Pre-IETF 88 Meeting
> Document Structuring
> Open Issues
>
> Pre-IIW Meeting:
> We will have several topics
>
> Possible Pre-IETF 88 Meeting:
> We will ask on the list
>
> Document Structuring:
> We reviewed Nat's first stab at http://nat.sakimura.org/2013/08/27/refactoring-openid-connect-drafts/
> Justin suggested combining Authentication Core and Authentication Implicit
> Security and Privacy Considerations are still missing from this
> Nat didn't yet have time to do the exercise of combining Messages and Standard
> George suggested that we could keep the organization that Nat has done but produce a single concatenated version
> George suggested that we could write a guide
> Justin suggested that we could write the guide as a set of wiki pages that refer to spec sections
> Nat said that we could name documents as Chapter 1, Chapter 2, etc.
> John suggested having a single document with modular chapters that could be considered standalone documents
> Mike said that the criticism he's heard most is that there are too many documents
> Mike said that he'd like to see the combined document
> Tony said that there is no place to start
> Nat also proposes to delete the Basic and Implicit specs
> Mike suggested that we have a "Getting Started" doc - Tony said that it could be called "Read Me First"
> Mike asked if Nat could produce a stab at the combined document
> He agreed that he would
> Then we could ask people on the list what they think of the different choices
> Tony said that SAML reorganized to combine about 20 documents into about 4
> Tony said that there isn't a simple way to understand conformance
> Nat said that he hasn't included the Implementation Considerations section yet
> Implementation Considerations could be renamed Conformance
> We will devote the next call after Nat produces the combined spec to continuing the discussion
> Tony said that SAML has a separate conformance doc
> It describes different implementations, such as SSO profile
> John said that that's where the conformance profiles are defined
> Nat said that he'd prefer that we have a separate conformance document
>
> Open Issues:
> There are no new open issues
> _______________________________________________
> Openid-specs-ab mailing list
> Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-ab/attachments/20130906/5f083efe/attachment.html>
More information about the Openid-specs-ab
mailing list