[Openid-specs-ab] Issue #884: Decide whether to keep Basic and Implicit in the final set of specifications (openid/connect)

[Torsten Lodderstedt]

Hi Mike,

why should there be a need to have such additional specs if the set of openid spec is better readable itself? I thought this is the goal of the whole restructuring. Furthermore, suplication of text, as in the case of the mentioned specs, makes maintaining consistency across specs harder.

regards,
Torsten.

> Am 09.10.2013 um 20:08 schrieb "Michael Jones" <issues-reply at bitbucket.org>:
> 
> New issue 884: Decide whether to keep Basic and Implicit in the final set of specifications
> https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/issue/884/decide-whether-to-keep-basic-and-implicit
> 
> Michael Jones:
> 
> We need to decide whether to keep the Basic and Implicit specs after the restructuring.  My sense is that we should, as they're audience-focused and people seem to have had good experiences using them.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openid-specs-ab mailing list
> Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab