[Openid-specs-ab] Another session management question: Per-user session state change notifications

Nat Sakimura sakimura at gmail.com
Fri May 24 23:19:11 UTC 2013


If Alice and Bob are different entities, they should be independent.

=nat

May 25, 2013 6:52、Mike Jones <Michael.Jones at microsoft.com> のメッセージ:

  Another one for you, Breno and Naveen…



Assume Alice and Bob are both have sessions within the same user agent at
the same RP using the same OP.  Currently, the session management spec
assumes that session state notifications caused by changes to either of
Alice’s or Bob’s session will cause “changed” notifications to be sent to
both of them, correct?  Developers I’m speaking with are saying that they’d
like it to be legal for Alice to only be notified of changes caused by her
session and for Bob to only be notified of changes caused by his session.
This would cut down on the number of false positives, which result in
unnecessary “prompt”: “none” reauthentication requests.



Is there any reason not to say that legal implementations may do this?  Or
is there some technical reason that Alice MUST always be made aware of
changes to Bob’s session, and vice versa?  Might it be that there’s no way
of knowing who’s asking within the user agent, and so both have to be
notified of changes caused by either?



                                                                Thanks all,

                                                                -- Mike



_______________________________________________
Openid-specs-ab mailing list
Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-ab/attachments/20130525/54764a12/attachment.html>


More information about the Openid-specs-ab mailing list