[Openid-specs-ab] [openid/connect] Registration 2.1 - Should request be form-urlencoded or JSON? (issue #747)

[Roland Hedberg]

+1

6 feb 2013 kl. 12:04 skrev Vladimir Dzhuvinov / NimbusDS <vladimir at nimbusds.com>:

> I like this proposal. Clients already have to be capable of dealing with
> JSON to process the registration responses. Switching to JSON for the
> requests will make the message exchange symmetrical too.
> 
> The ability to go beyond simple key/value pairs is also a plus I think.
> 
> Vladimir 
> 
> 
> --- you can reply above this line ---
> 
> New issue 747: Registration 2.1 - Should request be form-urlencoded or
> JSON?
> https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/issue/747/registration-21-should-request-be-form
> 
> Michael Jones:
> 
> Now that we're returning the registration state as JSON, it's pretty
> inconsistent for the registration request to instead be
> form-url-encoded. The case can be made for switching to JSON now -
> especially in light of possibly wanting to convey some structured
> information at registration time.
> 
> I realize that this is a big change, but if we're going to do it, we
> should do it now.
> 
> As a precedent, apparently SCIM requests are JSON, rather than
> form-url-encoded.
> 
> 
> --
> 
> This is an issue notification from bitbucket.org. You are receiving
> this either because you are the owner of the issue, or you are
> following the issue.
> _______________________________________________
> Openid-specs-ab mailing list
> Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab
> _______________________________________________
> Openid-specs-ab mailing list
> Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab

-- Roland
------------------------------------------------------
Roland Hedberg
IT Architect/Senior Researcher
ICT Services and System Development (ITS) 
Umeå University 
SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden	
Phone +46 90 786 68 44
Mobile +46 70 696 68 44 
www.its.umu.se