[Openid-specs-ab] Should we put self-issued into the Messages or should we create a separate document?

[Justin Richer]

> Responding to Justin's point about static infrastructure, I believe 
> that the way we're going to specify it will require no static 
> infrastructure.  Actually, it make is the protocol **more** 
> distributed, as it removes the dependence upon third party IdPs.
>
Doesn't it require selfissued.me to be there to answer for all of these 
self-issued pocket IdPs in terms of discovery? That's the functionality 
that I understood from the meeting at Yahoo.

  -- Justin*

From:*

  openid-specs-ab-bounces at lists.openid.net 
[mailto:openid-specs-ab-bounces at lists.openid.net] *On Behalf Of *Justin 
Richer
>
> *Sent:* Friday, May 18, 2012 8:17 AM
> *To:* openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
> *Subject:* Re: [Openid-specs-ab] Should we put self-issued into the 
> Messages or should we create a separate document?
>
> In my opinion, it's too much of a bolt-on bit of functionality to add 
> it to the core spec. It also presumes a few pieces of static 
> infrastructure to be in place in order to function, and I'm not 
> comfortable with a distributed protocol doing that in the first place.
>
>  -- Justin
>
> On 05/17/2012 05:29 PM, Nat Sakimura wrote:
>
> We have self-issued OP documented at 
> https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/issue/566/messages-standard-define-self-issued-op 
> .
>
> We have built the code that works.
>
> We decided not to create Userinfo token, but decided to include them 
> in the id_token.
>
> Registration overlay still have not reached the consensus.
>
> Having said that, we should now consider where we are going to put 
> these in.
>
> In Messages?
>
> Or a separate spec?
>
> Please discuss.
>
> -- 
> Nat Sakimura (=nat)
>
> Chairman, OpenID Foundation
> http://nat.sakimura.org/
> @_nat_en
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openid-specs-ab mailing list
> Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net  <mailto:Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net>
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-ab/attachments/20120518/847176b3/attachment.html>