[Openid-specs-ab] Potential ticket to file for registration

[John Bradley]

Registration is probably different enough to require a totally different spec anyway if you are dealing with a smart phone.
I don't know that separating registration into two documents helps much.


On 2012-01-17, at 7:27 PM, Nat Sakimura wrote:

> I am now considering the case for "IdP in a Smart Phone".
> That typically requires custom schema which is called through GET.
> 
> As the Messages is abstract, it allows it but the Registration does
> not as it mandates it to be done through POST. Perhaps it would have
> been better to separate a messages section and a binding section to
> allow other bindings to be defined later.
> 
> Nat Sakimura
> _______________________________________________
> Openid-specs-ab mailing list
> Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4767 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-ab/attachments/20120117/62eb0ff4/attachment.p7s>