[Openid-specs-ab] Should invalid_request_uri and invalid_request_request_uri be the same errors?

[Mike Jones]

Supporting data:

C:\mbj\DSG\OpenID>qgrep  invalid_request openid-connect-*1_0.xml
openid-connect-messages-1_0.xml:              <t hangText="invalid_request_redirect_uri">The
openid-connect-messages-1_0.xml:              <t hangText="invalid_request_uri">The
openid-connect-standard-1_0.xml:error=invalid_request
openid-connect-standard-1_0.xml: "error": "invalid_request"
openid-connect-standard-1_0.xml:        <section title="Authorization Endpoint Error (invalid_request_redirect_uri)">
openid-connect-standard-1_0.xml:              <t>Error name: invalid_request_redirect_uri </t>
openid-connect-standard-1_0.xml:        <section title="Authorization Endpoint Error (invalid_request_request_uri)">
openid-connect-standard-1_0.xml:              <t>Error name: invalid_request_request_uri </t>

From: openid-specs-ab-bounces at lists.openid.net [mailto:openid-specs-ab-bounces at lists.openid.net] On Behalf Of Mike Jones
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 2:43 PM
To: openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
Subject: [Openid-specs-ab] Should invalid_request_uri and invalid_request_request_uri be the same errors?

The first is in Messages.  The second is in Standard.  Should these be the same error?

Also, in Standard, two examples uses "invalid_request", which is neither of the above (but is an OAuth 2.0 error).

Is there are problem, or are the specs as they should be?

                                                            -- Mike

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-ab/attachments/20120227/1c36e638/attachment.html>