[Openid-specs-ab] Spec call notes 15-Sep-11
Mike Jones
Michael.Jones at microsoft.com
Thu Sep 15 22:47:59 UTC 2011
Spec call notes 15-Sep-11
Mike Jones
Nov Matake
Nat Sakimura
Edmund Jay
(John Bradley was flying and so couldn't make the call)
Agenda:
Issue Resolutions
Open Issues
Issues Identified During the Interop
Soliciting more developer feedback
Issue Resolution
Nat, John, Edmund and others met yesterday to go through the tracked issues
They developed proposed resolutions to all but two issues:
Issue 52: It was proposed to rename the check_session endpoint to check_id
No one on the call objected to the change
Edmund will make a post notifying the list of this change
Issue 31: When response type is code+token, how are the two tokens returned?
Nat and Edmund's proposal was that code should be returned in the query string and token in the fragment
John's proposal was that both be returned in the fragment, for the benefit of JavaScript clients
Edmund will post about this
Proposed to all the other issues were recorded in the tickets
They expect that these will be non-controversial
Edmund and Nat will do an initial editing pass incorporating these resolutions so people can review the revised specs
Open Issues
We need to think more about how to specify keys for encryption
Nat, John, and Mike to make a concrete proposal
Breno's idea about including a hash of one token in another
Status: Waiting for a concrete write-up by Breno
Session Management Rewrite
Status: Waiting for a concrete write-up by Breno
Recording specific versions of JWT, JWS, JWE, JWK to reference since Internet Drafts will expire
We need to decide on specific versions
Mike suggested waiting until JWT is revised to better document use of JWE
We need to decide on specific URLs
The proposal is to make copies on openid.net/specs
Issues Identified During the Interop
The key identification and usage issues for signing and encryption came up during the interop
Andres Solberg had an issue with id_token verification
Nov has asked him for more specifics
Nov will do a write-up of this issue
Soliciting more developer feedback
Nat suggested that we wait for the current set of issue resolution edits before making a big push
Edmund will try to produce drafts to review before Monday's call
We are targeting getting these versions up by Tuesday
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-ab/attachments/20110915/47a7318c/attachment.html>
More information about the Openid-specs-ab
mailing list