[Openid-specs-ab] What use case does exist behind response_type=none ?

[Nat Sakimura]

So, shall we drop it?

=nat via iPhone

On 2011/09/08, at 4:45, Breno de Medeiros <breno at google.com> wrote:

> This should be dealt with as an OAuth2 response-type extension, not
> here in openid-connect.
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:15, hideki nara <hdknr at ic-tact.co.jp> wrote:
>> John, thank you for your description.
>>
>> You may know that my question is related to
>> https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/issue/8/ .
>> Sounds that "none" is one missing that OAuth should have had.
>>
>> Breno-san will resolve this issue :-)
>> ---
>> hdknr
>>
>>
>> 2011/9/8 John Bradley <ve7jtb at ve7jtb.com>:
>>> Yes,  it is not specific to Connect, but a more general OAuth thing.
>>>
>>> It takes the user through authorization, but doesn't return code or token in the redirect response.
>>>
>>> Breno is probably the best one to answer on the specific use cases.
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> On 2011-09-07, at 3:14 PM, hideki nara <hdknr at ic-tact.co.jp> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello experts.
>>>>
>>>> Question about http://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-messages-1_0.html#auth_req
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>> I'm not quite sure why someone want to request for no reply.
>>>> Is there any special implication on response_type=none ?
>>>>
>>>> Regards.
>>>> ---
>>>> hdknr
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Openid-specs-ab mailing list
>>>> Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
>>>> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openid-specs-ab mailing list
>> Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
>> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab
>>
>
>
>
> --
> --Breno
> _______________________________________________
> Openid-specs-ab mailing list
> Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab