[Openid-specs-ab] What use case does exist behind response_type=none ?
Breno de Medeiros
breno at google.com
Wed Sep 7 19:41:20 UTC 2011
This should be dealt with as an OAuth2 response-type extension, not
here in openid-connect.
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:15, hideki nara <hdknr at ic-tact.co.jp> wrote:
> John, thank you for your description.
>
> You may know that my question is related to
> https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/issue/8/ .
> Sounds that "none" is one missing that OAuth should have had.
>
> Breno-san will resolve this issue :-)
> ---
> hdknr
>
>
> 2011/9/8 John Bradley <ve7jtb at ve7jtb.com>:
>> Yes, it is not specific to Connect, but a more general OAuth thing.
>>
>> It takes the user through authorization, but doesn't return code or token in the redirect response.
>>
>> Breno is probably the best one to answer on the specific use cases.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On 2011-09-07, at 3:14 PM, hideki nara <hdknr at ic-tact.co.jp> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello experts.
>>>
>>> Question about http://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-messages-1_0.html#auth_req
>>> .
>>>
>>> I'm not quite sure why someone want to request for no reply.
>>> Is there any special implication on response_type=none ?
>>>
>>> Regards.
>>> ---
>>> hdknr
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Openid-specs-ab mailing list
>>> Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
>>> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Openid-specs-ab mailing list
> Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab
>
--
--Breno
More information about the Openid-specs-ab
mailing list