[Openid-specs-ab] Agenda addition for today's call

[Mike Jones]

Yes, the plan is that this is a separate optional spec - per the decisions at IIW.  Breno is on point for writing this up.

                                                            -- Mike

From: Anthony Nadalin
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2011 10:59 AM
To: Mike Jones; Nat Sakimura; openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
Subject: RE: [Openid-specs-ab] Agenda addition for today's call

So is it really necessary to have a migration? I assume that if it's really needed it would be optional in a separate set of specs.

From: openid-specs-ab-bounces at lists.openid.net [mailto:openid-specs-ab-bounces at lists.openid.net] On Behalf Of Mike Jones
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2011 10:54 AM
To: Nat Sakimura; openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
Subject: Re: [Openid-specs-ab] Agenda addition for today's call

Thanks Nat.  I'd add to this list:

- IdP Discovery
- OpenID 2.0 Migration

                                                                Thanks,
                                                                -- Mike

From: openid-specs-ab-bounces at lists.openid.net<mailto:openid-specs-ab-bounces at lists.openid.net> [mailto:openid-specs-ab-bounces at lists.openid.net]<mailto:[mailto:openid-specs-ab-bounces at lists.openid.net]> On Behalf Of Nat Sakimura
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2011 10:52 AM
To: openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net<mailto:openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net>
Subject: [Openid-specs-ab] Agenda addition for today's call

I would like to propose the following for today's spec call.

1. Status check of each sub-specs.

Report from each sub-spec editors.

- Core
- UserInfo
- Session
- JWE
- Bindings

2. Whether or not to add non-normative text for Bindings

Currently, we have very little non-normative text in the Bindings and the reader has to go refer the Core and OAuth spec very often.
Perhaps including some non-normative text instead of just referencing would improve the readability.

3. Whether or not to merge Code Binding and Artifact Binding

In fact, the are only a few lines of difference now. Perhaps can we merge them together?

4. Separating out the session spec?

Right now, session spec is included in the core. A while ago, there seems to have been some talk around separating it out again.
I would like to close on this.

--
Nat Sakimura (=nat)
http://www.sakimura.org/en/
http://twitter.com/_nat_en
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-ab/attachments/20110620/d4cc4ba7/attachment.html>