[Openid-specs-ab] Versions published incorporating edits decided upon during 30-Jun-11 spec call

Breno de Medeiros breno at google.com
Wed Jul 6 22:14:55 UTC 2011


On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 22:14, Nat Sakimura <sakimura at gmail.com> wrote:
> Breno,
> I am confused.
> Core was never meant to be useful without Bindings. It is just a reference
> document / a building block / abstract class that is needed to be
> instantiated to a concrete spec by a binding.
> What you want seem to be a "Basic HTTP Binding" that has no JWT etc.,
> instead of a minimized core.
> A binding or a profile is the document that a developer should read.
> To make it easier for them to read, I do not mind having duplicate text
> between the binding and the core.

I think we should be focusing on the HTTP document now. The core can
be abstracted later.

We are trying to build momentum by publishing a set of specs that can
be the basis of interop events, for instance. The core spec does not
promote this goal.

I think we should table working on the abstract core for now and make
sure that the constellation of specs around the HTTP protocol
articulate well together and provide an end-to-end solution.

Once we have the concrete work cleaned up and stabilized, we can
extract an abstract core from it.

I think working in the core at the same time that we try to get the
other pieces together has been (a) creating confusion (b) preventing
us from concentrating on a fully articulated HTTP binding document, as
evidence by the fact that one currently does not exist (c) making it
hard to figure out the boundaries between the various documents.


> =nat
>
> On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Breno de Medeiros <breno at google.com> wrote:
>>
>> I am confused about the "HTTP Redirect Binding"
>>
>> - The Core now includes too little to be useful on its own without the
>> reference to HTTP Binding
>> - The HTTP Binding includes references to JWT which we agreed should
>> not be necessary for basic implementations
>>
>> Am I missing something?
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 10:43, Mike Jones <Michael.Jones at microsoft.com>
>> wrote:
>> > OpenID Connect Framework:
>> > http://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-framework-1_0.html
>> >
>> > OpenID Connect HTTP Redirect Binding:
>> > http://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-http-redirect-1_0.html
>> >
>> > OpenID Connect UserInfo Endpoint:
>> > http://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-userinfo-1_0.html
>> >
>> > Sources:  http://svn.openid.net/repos/specifications/connect/1.0/
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >                                                             -- Mike
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Openid-specs-ab mailing list
>> > Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
>> > http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> --Breno
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openid-specs-ab mailing list
>> Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
>> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab
>
>
>
> --
> Nat Sakimura (=nat)
> http://www.sakimura.org/en/
> http://twitter.com/_nat_en
>



-- 
--Breno



More information about the Openid-specs-ab mailing list