[Openid-specs-ab] Endpoint registration !?

[John Bradley]

In principal nothing stops the claims being added to the user info_endpoint they are already URI named so there will not be a collision.   

If there are archetectural reasons to separate them that is fine, use the distributed claims, or some combination.

A separate endpoint would allow getting them in XML or some other format if that was required as well.

John B.
On 2011-12-14, at 10:45 PM, Allen Tom wrote:

> Hi Roland,
> 
> I believe that it's OK to add more attributes to the user-info endpoint, so rather than creating a new eduPerson endpoint, why not just extend the user-info endpoint?
> 
> Allen
> 
> 
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Roland Hedberg <roland.hedberg at adm.umu.se> wrote:
> 
> It was quite obvious that we for instance needed more and more varied identity information.
> So the (crazy?) idea came up that we would define a new endpoint beside the user-info endpoint, the eduPerson endpoint.
> Ideas about group/scim/authz endpoints also surfaced.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openid-specs-ab mailing list
> Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-ab/attachments/20111214/caad98fc/attachment.html>