On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Snorri <<a href="mailto:snorri@snorri.eu" target="_blank">snorri@snorri.eu</a>> wrote: <div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div link="blue" vlink="purple" lang="FR"><div><br><p><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);" lang="EN-US">The goal of this policy is not to be binding, it has just been
planned to avoid abuses by some in the future…</span></p></div></div></blockquote><div>I am not a lawyer, so this might be completely wrong but I think this statement is in complete contrast to this one: <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div link="blue" vlink="purple" lang="FR"><div><br><p><span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);" lang="EN-US">There has been a lot of conversation about the use of the TM
symbol, all lawyers explain that it is important to write it… to avoid in the
future OpenID become a word like "kleenex", "email"…</span></p></div></div></blockquote><div>If you don't enforce the correct use of the logo, wording,... it will become open to use for everybody the way they want it to use. It will be as common as RSS or SSL which won't be bad, by the way. See Hans' email.<br>
</div>
</div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><a href="http://www.notsorelevant.com" target="_blank">http://www.notsorelevant.com</a><br><a href="http://spreadopenid.org" target="_blank">http://spreadopenid.org</a><br>