From sakimura at gmail.com  Fri Jun  5 00:04:33 2009
From: sakimura at gmail.com (Nat Sakimura)
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 16:04:33 +0900
Subject: [legal] Outdated Contribution Agreement
Message-ID: <bf26e2340906050004h6b1dfe97qa941ed9622a57313@mail.gmail.com>

--00163662e65c34587c046b94814b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Fellow board members, legal council,  and legal community:

I just looked at http://openid.net/ipr/Non-Assertion-Agreement/ and
http://openid.net/ipr/Non-Assertion-Agreement/executed/

For people to join new Working Group, these seem to be out of date.

We should remove

http://openid.net/ipr/Non-Assertion-Agreement/OpenID_IP_Contribution_Agreement_(Entities)_20071205.pdf
http://openid.net/ipr/Non-Assertion-Agreement/OpenID_IP_Contribution_Agreement_(Individuals)_20071205.pdf

and put the new ones

http://openid.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/paper-contribution-agr-final-clean-20080107.doc
http://openid.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/paper-contribution-agr-final-clean-20080107.pdf

instead.

Also, we must make sure that the relevant parties submit new Contribution
Agreement when they start working on a new working group.

In addition, it might be possible that we have to do the same for PAPE 1.0
retrospectively. (I hope not.)

I seek legal people's advice on this.

Best,

-- 
Nat Sakimura (=nat)
http://www.sakimura.org/en/

--00163662e65c34587c046b94814b
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Fellow board members, legal council,=A0 and legal community: <br><br>I just=
 looked at <a href=3D"http://openid.net/ipr/Non-Assertion-Agreement/">http:=
//openid.net/ipr/Non-Assertion-Agreement/</a> and <a href=3D"http://openid.=
net/ipr/Non-Assertion-Agreement/executed/">http://openid.net/ipr/Non-Assert=
ion-Agreement/executed/</a><br>
<br>For people to join new Working Group, these seem to be out of date. <br=
><br>We should remove <br><br><a href=3D"http://openid.net/ipr/Non-Assertio=
n-Agreement/OpenID_IP_Contribution_Agreement_(Entities)_20071205.pdf">http:=
//openid.net/ipr/Non-Assertion-Agreement/OpenID_IP_Contribution_Agreement_(=
Entities)_20071205.pdf</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://openid.net/ipr/Non-Assertion-Agreement/OpenID_IP_Contribu=
tion_Agreement_(Individuals)_20071205.pdf">http://openid.net/ipr/Non-Assert=
ion-Agreement/OpenID_IP_Contribution_Agreement_(Individuals)_20071205.pdf</=
a><br>
<br>and put the new ones<br><br><a href=3D"http://openid.net/wp-content/upl=
oads/2008/03/paper-contribution-agr-final-clean-20080107.doc">http://openid=
.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/paper-contribution-agr-final-clean-20080107=
.doc</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://openid.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/paper-contribution-=
agr-final-clean-20080107.pdf">http://openid.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/=
paper-contribution-agr-final-clean-20080107.pdf</a><br><br>instead. <br><br=
>
Also, we must make sure that the relevant parties submit new Contribution A=
greement when they start working on a new working group. <br><br>In additio=
n, it might be possible that we have to do the same for PAPE 1.0 retrospect=
ively. (I hope not.) <br>
<br>I seek legal people&#39;s advice on this. <br><br>Best, <br clear=3D"al=
l"><br>-- <br>Nat Sakimura (=3Dnat)<br><a href=3D"http://www.sakimura.org/e=
n/">http://www.sakimura.org/en/</a><br>

--00163662e65c34587c046b94814b--

From sakimura at gmail.com  Fri Jun  5 00:52:13 2009
From: sakimura at gmail.com (Nat Sakimura)
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 16:52:13 +0900
Subject: [legal] Any update on OpenID TM and Logo usage guideline?
Message-ID: <bf26e2340906050052v5576a3faka380b0ee3ede005a@mail.gmail.com>

--001636283644aa2774046b952b64
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Recently, we have found some traffic on the OpenID TM usage at Google code.
This kind of thing should be straight forward once we have a decent TM and
Logo usage policy published.

As far as I remember, there was some work going on.
I think we should quickly finish off.
We really should have TRAC or something set up so that we can track and
chase...

Is there any volunteer for this? (Preferably with legal qualification.)

Cheers,

-- 
Nat Sakimura (=nat)
http://www.sakimura.org/en/

--001636283644aa2774046b952b64
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Recently, we have found some traffic on the OpenID TM usage at Google code. <br>This kind of thing should be straight forward once we have a decent TM and Logo usage policy published. <br><br>As far as I remember, there was some work going on. <br>
I think we should quickly finish off. <br>We really should have TRAC or something set up so that we can track and chase...<br><br>Is there any volunteer for this? (Preferably with legal qualification.) <br><br>Cheers, <br clear="all">
<br>-- <br>Nat Sakimura (=nat)<br><a href="http://www.sakimura.org/en/">http://www.sakimura.org/en/</a><br>

--001636283644aa2774046b952b64--

From chris.messina at gmail.com  Sun Jun  7 19:29:18 2009
From: chris.messina at gmail.com (Chris Messina)
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 19:29:18 -0700
Subject: [legal] [OpenID board] Outdated Contribution Agreement
In-Reply-To: <bf26e2340906050004h6b1dfe97qa941ed9622a57313@mail.gmail.com>
References: <bf26e2340906050004h6b1dfe97qa941ed9622a57313@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1bc4603e0906071929o2d1d26ffs8f1a220795dd990a@mail.gmail.com>

--0016363b85b05112ca046bcd0241
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Who is in charge of this to make it happen?
If someone doesn't own it, it probably won't happen, even if it should. I'm
not volunteering either, just asking.

Chris

On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Nat Sakimura <sakimura at gmail.com> wrote:

> Fellow board members, legal council,  and legal community:
>
> I just looked at http://openid.net/ipr/Non-Assertion-Agreement/ and
> http://openid.net/ipr/Non-Assertion-Agreement/executed/
>
> For people to join new Working Group, these seem to be out of date.
>
> We should remove
>
>
> http://openid.net/ipr/Non-Assertion-Agreement/OpenID_IP_Contribution_Agreement_(Entities)_20071205.pdf
>
> http://openid.net/ipr/Non-Assertion-Agreement/OpenID_IP_Contribution_Agreement_(Individuals)_20071205.pdf
>
> and put the new ones
>
>
> http://openid.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/paper-contribution-agr-final-clean-20080107.doc
>
> http://openid.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/paper-contribution-agr-final-clean-20080107.pdf
>
> instead.
>
> Also, we must make sure that the relevant parties submit new Contribution
> Agreement when they start working on a new working group.
>
> In addition, it might be possible that we have to do the same for PAPE 1.0
> retrospectively. (I hope not.)
>
> I seek legal people's advice on this.
>
> Best,
>
> --
> Nat Sakimura (=nat)
> http://www.sakimura.org/en/
>
> _______________________________________________
> board mailing list
> board at openid.net
> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
>
>


-- 
Chris Messina
Open Web Advocate

Personal site: http://factoryjoe.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/chrismessina

Diso Project: http://diso-project.org
OpenID Foundation: http://openid.net

This email is:   [ ] bloggable    [X] ask first   [ ] private

--0016363b85b05112ca046bcd0241
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Who is in charge of this to make it happen?<div><br></div><div>If someone d=
oesn&#39;t own it, it probably won&#39;t happen, even if it should. I&#39;m=
 not volunteering either, just asking.</div><div><br></div><div>Chris<br>
<br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Nat Sakimur=
a <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:sakimura at gmail.com">sakimura at gmai=
l.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"m=
argin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Fellow board members, legal council,=A0 and legal community: <br><br>I just=
 looked at <a href=3D"http://openid.net/ipr/Non-Assertion-Agreement/" targe=
t=3D"_blank">http://openid.net/ipr/Non-Assertion-Agreement/</a> and <a href=
=3D"http://openid.net/ipr/Non-Assertion-Agreement/executed/" target=3D"_bla=
nk">http://openid.net/ipr/Non-Assertion-Agreement/executed/</a><br>

<br>For people to join new Working Group, these seem to be out of date. <br=
><br>We should remove <br><br><a href=3D"http://openid.net/ipr/Non-Assertio=
n-Agreement/OpenID_IP_Contribution_Agreement_(Entities)_20071205.pdf" targe=
t=3D"_blank">http://openid.net/ipr/Non-Assertion-Agreement/OpenID_IP_Contri=
bution_Agreement_(Entities)_20071205.pdf</a><br>

<a href=3D"http://openid.net/ipr/Non-Assertion-Agreement/OpenID_IP_Contribu=
tion_Agreement_(Individuals)_20071205.pdf" target=3D"_blank">http://openid.=
net/ipr/Non-Assertion-Agreement/OpenID_IP_Contribution_Agreement_(Individua=
ls)_20071205.pdf</a><br>

<br>and put the new ones<br><br><a href=3D"http://openid.net/wp-content/upl=
oads/2008/03/paper-contribution-agr-final-clean-20080107.doc" target=3D"_bl=
ank">http://openid.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/paper-contribution-agr-fi=
nal-clean-20080107.doc</a><br>

<a href=3D"http://openid.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/paper-contribution-=
agr-final-clean-20080107.pdf" target=3D"_blank">http://openid.net/wp-conten=
t/uploads/2008/03/paper-contribution-agr-final-clean-20080107.pdf</a><br><b=
r>
instead. <br><br>
Also, we must make sure that the relevant parties submit new Contribution A=
greement when they start working on a new working group. <br><br>In additio=
n, it might be possible that we have to do the same for PAPE 1.0 retrospect=
ively. (I hope not.) <br>

<br>I seek legal people&#39;s advice on this. <br><br>Best, <br clear=3D"al=
l"><font color=3D"#888888"><br>-- <br>Nat Sakimura (=3Dnat)<br><a href=3D"h=
ttp://www.sakimura.org/en/" target=3D"_blank">http://www.sakimura.org/en/</=
a><br>

</font><br>_______________________________________________<br>
board mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:board at openid.net">board at openid.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board" target=3D"_blank">http=
://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear=3D"all"><br>-- <br>Chris Messina<br>Op=
en Web Advocate<br><br>Personal site: <a href=3D"http://factoryjoe.com">htt=
p://factoryjoe.com</a><br>Twitter: <a href=3D"http://twitter.com/chrismessi=
na">http://twitter.com/chrismessina</a><br>
<br>Diso Project: <a href=3D"http://diso-project.org">http://diso-project.o=
rg</a><br>OpenID Foundation: <a href=3D"http://openid.net">http://openid.ne=
t</a><br><br>This email is: =A0 [ ] bloggable =A0 =A0[X] ask first =A0 [ ] =
private<br>

</div>

--0016363b85b05112ca046bcd0241--

From sakimura at gmail.com  Fri Jun  5 07:04:33 2009
From: sakimura at gmail.com (Nat Sakimura)
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 16:04:33 +0900
Subject: [legal] Outdated Contribution Agreement
Message-ID: <bf26e2340906050004h6b1dfe97qa941ed9622a57313@mail.gmail.com>

Fellow board members, legal council,  and legal community:

I just looked at http://openid.net/ipr/Non-Assertion-Agreement/ and
http://openid.net/ipr/Non-Assertion-Agreement/executed/

For people to join new Working Group, these seem to be out of date.

We should remove

http://openid.net/ipr/Non-Assertion-Agreement/OpenID_IP_Contribution_Agreement_(Entities)_20071205.pdf
http://openid.net/ipr/Non-Assertion-Agreement/OpenID_IP_Contribution_Agreement_(Individuals)_20071205.pdf

and put the new ones

http://openid.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/paper-contribution-agr-final-clean-20080107.doc
http://openid.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/paper-contribution-agr-final-clean-20080107.pdf

instead.

Also, we must make sure that the relevant parties submit new Contribution
Agreement when they start working on a new working group.

In addition, it might be possible that we have to do the same for PAPE 1.0
retrospectively. (I hope not.)

I seek legal people's advice on this.

Best,

-- 
Nat Sakimura (=nat)
http://www.sakimura.org/en/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-legal/attachments/20090605/4723fb9a/attachment.htm>

From sakimura at gmail.com  Fri Jun  5 07:52:13 2009
From: sakimura at gmail.com (Nat Sakimura)
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 16:52:13 +0900
Subject: [legal] Any update on OpenID TM and Logo usage guideline?
Message-ID: <bf26e2340906050052v5576a3faka380b0ee3ede005a@mail.gmail.com>

Recently, we have found some traffic on the OpenID TM usage at Google code.
This kind of thing should be straight forward once we have a decent TM and
Logo usage policy published.

As far as I remember, there was some work going on.
I think we should quickly finish off.
We really should have TRAC or something set up so that we can track and
chase...

Is there any volunteer for this? (Preferably with legal qualification.)

Cheers,

-- 
Nat Sakimura (=nat)
http://www.sakimura.org/en/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-legal/attachments/20090605/a0fa9385/attachment.htm>

From chris.messina at gmail.com  Mon Jun  8 02:29:18 2009
From: chris.messina at gmail.com (Chris Messina)
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 19:29:18 -0700
Subject: [legal] [OpenID board] Outdated Contribution Agreement
In-Reply-To: <bf26e2340906050004h6b1dfe97qa941ed9622a57313@mail.gmail.com>
References: <bf26e2340906050004h6b1dfe97qa941ed9622a57313@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1bc4603e0906071929o2d1d26ffs8f1a220795dd990a@mail.gmail.com>

Who is in charge of this to make it happen?
If someone doesn't own it, it probably won't happen, even if it should. I'm
not volunteering either, just asking.

Chris

On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Nat Sakimura <sakimura at gmail.com> wrote:

> Fellow board members, legal council,  and legal community:
>
> I just looked at http://openid.net/ipr/Non-Assertion-Agreement/ and
> http://openid.net/ipr/Non-Assertion-Agreement/executed/
>
> For people to join new Working Group, these seem to be out of date.
>
> We should remove
>
>
> http://openid.net/ipr/Non-Assertion-Agreement/OpenID_IP_Contribution_Agreement_(Entities)_20071205.pdf
>
> http://openid.net/ipr/Non-Assertion-Agreement/OpenID_IP_Contribution_Agreement_(Individuals)_20071205.pdf
>
> and put the new ones
>
>
> http://openid.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/paper-contribution-agr-final-clean-20080107.doc
>
> http://openid.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/paper-contribution-agr-final-clean-20080107.pdf
>
> instead.
>
> Also, we must make sure that the relevant parties submit new Contribution
> Agreement when they start working on a new working group.
>
> In addition, it might be possible that we have to do the same for PAPE 1.0
> retrospectively. (I hope not.)
>
> I seek legal people's advice on this.
>
> Best,
>
> --
> Nat Sakimura (=nat)
> http://www.sakimura.org/en/
>
> _______________________________________________
> board mailing list
> board at openid.net
> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
>
>


-- 
Chris Messina
Open Web Advocate

Personal site: http://factoryjoe.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/chrismessina

Diso Project: http://diso-project.org
OpenID Foundation: http://openid.net

This email is:   [ ] bloggable    [X] ask first   [ ] private
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-legal/attachments/20090607/230e5c4d/attachment.htm>