<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:28 AM, SitG Admin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sysadmin@shadowsinthegarden.com">sysadmin@shadowsinthegarden.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div><div class="im">
<div>Maarten's perspective is that mandatory compliance, not optional
compliance, inspires more trust.</div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Right. And he wants OpenID, as "OpenID," to start enforcing this. Which isn't going to happen because the OpenID brand isn't about that. Something else -- "OpenYetSecureID" or such -- could be the name for OpenID "done right" from the security perspective.</div>
<div><br></div><div>I am not in a position to do anything other than pose the questions if the two resulting conversations, "What exactly is the Secure OpenID BCP" and "What do we call it?" are proper traffic for this list. I'm only here because something earlier in the thread triggered a filter that routed the message into a folder i regularly look at; I'm glad Shade was able to use today's new .sig constructively, it's selection as a .sig was due to a decision made prior to entering this discussion (FMTYNTK, yeah)</div>
<div><br></div><div>Ciao</div><div><br></div><div>Dave</div><div><br></div></div>-- <br>"Elevator Inspection Certificate is on file in the Maintenance Office"<br><br>