<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 6:22 PM, Melvin Carvalho <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:melvincarvalho@gmail.com">melvincarvalho@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="gmail_quote"><div><br>One final question:<br><br>Supposing someone were to make an authentication protocol, say, usable in the browser. Not using the OpenID brand, but perhaps sharing some philosophical ideas. <br>
<br>If this protocol were released under an open source license, would it be safe from OpenID contributor patents?</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Again, IANAL and this is my interpretation of things, but unless you get a non-assert from the relevant patent holders (of *any* patented authentication protocols) you're on your own.</div>
<div><br></div><div>That is, if you infringed on patents held by OpenID contributors, it'd be up to you to receive a license (or equal non-assert) for the relevant IP that you've implemented in order to "be safe from OpenID contributor patents". </div>
<div><br></div><div>Chris</div></div><br>-- <br>Chris Messina<br>Open Web Advocate, Google<br><br>Personal: <a href="http://factoryjoe.com">http://factoryjoe.com</a><br>Follow me on Buzz: <a href="http://buzz.google.com/chrismessina">http://buzz.google.com/chrismessina</a> <br>
...or Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/chrismessina">http://twitter.com/chrismessina</a> <br><br>This email is: [ ] shareable [X] ask first [ ] private<br>