Maybe thats a problem with the XRD Spec you guys really need to reconsider.<div><br><div>How long are you guys going to keep hiding behind such logic?</div><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Will Norris <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:will@willnorris.com">will@willnorris.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class="im"><br>
On Nov 4, 2009, at 7:28 AM, SitG Admin wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
If you really want to do that, why don't you allow for an "Anonymous XRD" who's Subject is empty?<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Why require all XRD's to have a Subject field, if it can be empty? Can't it just be omitted entirely, saving bandwidth from transmitting an extra 19 (plus whitespace) bytes?<br>
<br>
If it can be empty, it can be omitted - as I've said before, the lack of a field can implicitly be taken as the emptiness of a field.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br></div>
you cannot have an empty subject. See section 1.5.2:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Unless otherwise noted in this specification or particular profiles, all URIs in XRD documents MUST consist of at least one non-whitespace character.<br>
</blockquote><div><div></div><div class="h5">
<br>
-will<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
general mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:general@lists.openid.net" target="_blank">general@lists.openid.net</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-general" target="_blank">http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-general</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><a href="http://hi.im/santosh">http://hi.im/santosh</a><br><br><br>
</div></div>