<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">Excellent point David.<div><br></div><div>Clearly for this proposed work to be profiled by ICAM for use by the US Government we need to consider Section 508 of the 1998 Rehabilitation Act.</div><div><br></div><div>A colour representation suitable for screen readers from all browser vendors would need to be found.</div><div><br></div><div>This is a tricker question than first anticipated.</div><div><br></div><div>John B.<br><div><div>On 2009-10-21, at 12:56 PM, David Recordon wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite">What are the Section 508 implications of selecting said colors?<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 8:50 AM, John Bradley <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com">ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">If we are going that way I prefer CYMK. However we need to remember that open standards cannot represent Panatone 185.<br>
<br>
Perhaps we need to start up a WG to properly study the colour issue.<br>
<br>
John B.<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
<br>
On 2009-10-21, at 12:26 PM, Leon P. Kuunders wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
It would be logical to just use RGB formatting. Isn't that universal?<br>
<br>
------Original Message------<br>
From: SitG Admin<br>
Sender: <a href="mailto:openid-general-bounces@lists.openid.net" target="_blank">openid-general-bounces@lists.openid.net</a><br>
To: John Bradley<br>
Cc: <a href="mailto:openid-general@lists.openid.net" target="_blank">openid-general@lists.openid.net</a><br>
Subject: Re: [OpenID] Open Challenge to webfinger and XRD<br>
Sent: Oct 21, 2009 17:07<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Is it possible to represent colour in SAML?<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Should we have different values per system of spelling ('color' for<br>
Americans', 'colour' for Europeans) to ensure ethnic flexibility? Or<br>
perhaps keep things easier for developers (not to mention retaining<br>
interoperability) by settling on a single word that everyone can<br>
agree to disagree on? I propose that we achieve compromise by<br>
creating a spelling that *noone* thinks is correct: that way,<br>
*everyone* will be unhappy (and thus equal) :)<br>
<br>
-Shade<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
general mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:general@lists.openid.net" target="_blank">general@lists.openid.net</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-general" target="_blank">http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-general</a><br>
<br>
<br>
Groet!<br>
<br>
Leon P. Kuunders<br>
M: +31 6411 64 995<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
general mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:general@lists.openid.net" target="_blank">general@lists.openid.net</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-general" target="_blank">http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-general</a><br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
general mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:general@lists.openid.net">general@lists.openid.net</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-general" target="_blank">http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-general</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>