That sounds like what we call an "unsolicited assertion". <div><br></div><div>DotNetOpenAuth supports this on both ends and has samples that demonstrate it.</div><div><br></div><div>--</div><div>Andrew Arnott<br>
"I [may] not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it." - S. G. Tallentyre<br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 3:50 PM, SitG Admin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sysadmin@shadowsinthegarden.com">sysadmin@shadowsinthegarden.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
I'm just curious if anyone knows of, or is thinking about, plans for the next version of OpenID to include a RP-discovery step, or any other communication (with the RP) that is initiated by the OP.<br>
<br>
Just curious for now, not actively planning anything myself; the relevance would be to hidden services running on Tor (and using OpenID).<br>
<br>
-Shade<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
general mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:general@lists.openid.net" target="_blank">general@lists.openid.net</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-general" target="_blank">http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-general</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>