<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
On 12/17/2008 04:22 AM, SitG Admin:
<blockquote cite="mid:f06110404c56e10c3a768@%5B192.168.0.2%5D"
type="cite">
<style type="text/css"><!--
blockquote, dl, ul, ol, li { padding-top: 0 ; padding-bottom: 0 }
--></style>
<title>Re: [OpenID] popup protocol UX? Re: FB Connect,
OpenID and</title>
<div><tt>>>Login with your Independent (brand)
OpenID?</tt></div>
<div><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://openid.net/pipermail/general/2008-October/006179.html"><tt>>>http://openid.net/pipermail/general/2008-October/006179.html</tt></a></div>
<div><tt>>>I wonder if we'll have different "skins"
for OpenID.</tt></div>
<div><tt>></tt></div>
<div><tt>></tt>Isn't this brand called...errr...OpenID
perhaps?</div>
<div>><br>
>Incidentally, the above link hits the nail....</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>This may confuse some people since OpenID is also the underlying
technology. If we have OpenID, and then ask people to recognize
*their* brand of OpenID (that being Google, etcetera), it may confuse
them to see a login box that just says "OpenID":</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Except that the Yahooglebook brands aren't using the name OpenID
anywhere and at all perhaps? This would simplify everything, we could
name ours simply OpenID.<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>