Y'know, all we need is a public list of the people who are responsible for the content of the website who have some authority to make changes and to oversee them when they happen.<div><br></div><div>I appreciate process and discipline but I prefer prudent action and delegating responsibility. If we can get some transparency here so we know when changes are made and can review them, I'd prefer to keep overhead and process as minimal as possible.</div>
<div><br></div><div>If we had *too* much content or too many folks eager to contribute, I'd think a voting committee might be necessary; as that's not the case, I think we can simply improve the situation with a few tweaks and some documentation on the [new] wiki.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Chris <br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 12:15 PM, Johannes Ernst <span dir="ltr"><jernst+<a href="http://openid.net">openid.net</a>@<a href="http://netmesh.us">netmesh.us</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">As a matter of personal preference, I don't like to do lame duck votes<br>
unless there's something really urgent that needs to happen.<br>
<br>
Anybody feel the issue on the table is urgent? If so, we should do<br>
what David suggests.<br>
<div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br>
<br>
<br>
On Dec 5, 2008, at 11:54, David Recordon wrote:<br>
<br>
> Agreed. :) Why don't we go and do this now? I'll work with you on<br>
> a motion and we could try to get it passed via email.<br>
><br>
> On Dec 5, 2008, at 11:47 AM, Johannes Ernst wrote:<br>
><br>
>> To clarify, I'm not criticizing any individual. (I am very<br>
>> appreciative of the lots of efforts that have gone into the site by<br>
>> the various volunteers.)<br>
>><br>
>> I am criticizing a lack of process and discipline. Which means we<br>
>> need to change it, and all I want to say is:<br>
>> - I think we need an accountable editorial committee to own that<br>
>> process<br>
>> - If back on the board, I'll vote for it. I believe such a<br>
>> committee needs to be chartered by the new board to be able to do<br>
>> its job.<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Johannes Ernst<br>
>> NetMesh Inc.<br>
>><br>
>> <lid.gif> <openid.gif> <a href="http://netmesh.info/jernst" target="_blank">http://netmesh.info/jernst</a><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> general mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:general@openid.net">general@openid.net</a><br>
>> <a href="http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/general" target="_blank">http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/general</a><br>
><br>
><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
general mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:general@openid.net">general@openid.net</a><br>
<a href="http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/general" target="_blank">http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/general</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Chris Messina<br>Citizen-Participant &<br> Open Technology Advocate-at-Large<br><a href="http://factoryjoe.com">factoryjoe.com</a> # <a href="http://diso-project.org">diso-project.org</a><br>
<a href="http://citizenagency.com">citizenagency.com</a> # <a href="http://vidoop.com">vidoop.com</a><br>This email is: [ ] bloggable [X] ask first [ ] private<br>
</div>