+1<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 8:09 PM, SitG Admin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sysadmin@shadowsinthegarden.com">sysadmin@shadowsinthegarden.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">>I blogged about emails as OpenID "hints" (among other things) earlier today:<br>
><br>
><a href="http://tr.im/openid_oxymoron" target="_blank">http://tr.im/openid_oxymoron</a><br>
<br>
</div>Regarding one of the other things: if we shift from OpenID as a brand<br>
to letting large companies like Yahoo! and Google use their own name<br>
for it, we risk creating an environment where trust *relies* on<br>
recognizing the familiar brand you already know. I propose one way of<br>
addressing that risk: for OP's with a smaller number of users (and<br>
especially just one), they can share the "Independent" brandname.<br>
<br>
-Shade<br>
<div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">_______________________________________________<br>
general mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:general@openid.net">general@openid.net</a><br>
<a href="http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/general" target="_blank">http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/general</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>