<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">
<!--[if !mso]>
<style>
v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style>
<![endif]-->
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Consolas;
panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:black;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
pre
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted Char";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";
color:black;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:windowtext;}
span.HTMLPreformattedChar
{mso-style-name:"HTML Preformatted Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted";
font-family:Consolas;
color:black;}
span.EmailStyle20
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page Section1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body bgcolor=white lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple>
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>I don’t believe in lines for
email-based standards processes; on this I like the way IETF does it. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>There is a wider issue, beyond simple
citation by line numbers, in MY view. Their lack forces people to argue the issues
(ad nauseam) in their own words. This has a nice side effect of teaching the passive
listeners, too. In general, all this promotes transparency, is inclusive, and
puts barriers into the adoption of “expert culture”. It does have a
downside: email overload.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Standardization can quickly become
backroom deals, which favors folks with access, who have funds for travel and conferences,
or who belong to particular other Boards, trading groups or investment funds.
In some forums, that is the prevailing culture (and I don’t belong, there
). In other forums, with grassroots-based missions (like UCI), the process often
entails design that retains the grassroots focus.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>When the passion of the argument
is evident, and when viewing the language use and phrasing of the arguer over
time, you can typically see from which constituency they hail. At that point,
you can look on at the consensus of constituencies and gauge the social value
of the standardization of the market.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";
color:windowtext'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:
"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext'> general-bounces@openid.net
[mailto:general-bounces@openid.net] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Paul Madsen<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, October 23, 2008 6:19 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Mike Jones<br>
<b>Cc:</b> specs@openid.net; general@openid.net<br>
<b>Subject:</b> [SPAM]Re: [OpenID] PAPE Specification Review Period Commencing<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Hi Mike, if there were an official line numbered version, it
would enable people providing comments against specific lines<br>
<br>
Or is there another preferred mechanism for feedback?<br>
<br>
Thanks<br>
<br>
Paul<br>
<br>
Mike Jones wrote: <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The OpenID Provider Authentication Policy Extension (PAPE)
Working Group recommends approval of PAPE Draft 7 as an OpenID
Specification. The draft is available at these locations:<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><a
href="http://openid.net/specs/openid-provider-authentication-policy-extension-1_0-07.html">http://openid.net/specs/openid-provider-authentication-policy-extension-1_0-07.html</a><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><a
href="http://openid.net/specs/openid-provider-authentication-policy-extension-1_0-07.txt">http://openid.net/specs/openid-provider-authentication-policy-extension-1_0-07.txt</a><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>This note starts the 60 day public review period for the
specification draft in accordance with the OpenID Foundation IPR policies and
procedures. This review period will end on Sunday, December 21st.
Unless issues are identified during the review that the working group believes
must be addressed by revising the draft, this review period will be followed by
a seven day voting period during which OpenID Foundation members will vote on
whether to approve this draft as an OpenID Specification.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>As background, the proposal to create the working group,
which the membership approved, is available at <a
href="http://openid.net/pipermail/specs/2008-May/002323.html">http://openid.net/pipermail/specs/2008-May/002323.html</a>.
The specifications council report on the creation of the working group is
available at <a href="http://openid.net/pipermail/specs/2008-May/002326.html">http://openid.net/pipermail/specs/2008-May/002326.html</a>.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>
-- Mike<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p>
<pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre style='text-align:center'>
<hr size=4 width="90%" align=center>
</pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre>_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></pre><pre>specs mailing list<o:p></o:p></pre><pre><a
href="mailto:specs@openid.net">specs@openid.net</a><o:p></o:p></pre><pre><a
href="http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs">http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs</a><o:p></o:p></pre><pre> <o:p></o:p></pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre
style='text-align:center'>
<hr size=4 width="90%" align=center>
</pre><pre><o:p> </o:p></pre><pre>No virus found in this incoming message.<o:p></o:p></pre><pre>Checked by AVG. <o:p></o:p></pre><pre>Version: 7.5.549 / Virus Database: 270.8.2/1739 - Release Date: 22/10/2008 7:23 AM<o:p></o:p></pre><pre> <o:p></o:p></pre>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"'>--
<br>
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/%7Er/blogspot/gMwy/%7E6/1"><span
style='text-decoration:none'><img border=0 width=400 height=82 id="_x0000_i1027"
src="cid:image001.gif@01C934DE.EC396BE0" alt=ConnectID></span></a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>