<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<br>
On 10/23/2008 01:34 AM, Martin Atkins:
<blockquote cite="mid:48FFB880.5030208@degeneration.co.uk" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Chris Messina wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I think for trusted OPs (determined by the RP), the email address that
is provided could be considered to be verified. It's just not really
done that way today, from what I've seen.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
I'd guess that a contributing factor here is that most OPs don't support
passing the email address via SREG. Does anyone other than MyOpenID do
that? Specifically, OPs that are also email providers, which I think
includes AOL, Yahoo! and LiveJournal.
</pre>
</blockquote>
Don't know about the big ones above, but StartSSL does, the email
address is also validated. Users can opt to remain anonymous however.<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">Regards </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2"> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Signer: </td>
<td>Eddy Nigg, <a href="http://www.startcom.org">StartCom Ltd.</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jabber: </td>
<td><a href="xmpp:startcom@startcom.org">startcom@startcom.org</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Blog: </td>
<td><a href="http://blog.startcom.org">Join the Revolution!</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Phone: </td>
<td>+1.213.341.0390</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2"> </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<br>
</body>
</html>