What's the story with the multiple type URIs for the simple registration extension? I see various ones used and referenced. Which one(s) are important to support, and which one is the best one to use? (Visually comparing the 1.0 and 1.1 draft specs of sreg doesn't even reveal any differences other than a type URI is defined in the latter).<br>
<br><a href="http://openid.net/sreg/1.0">http://openid.net/sreg/1.0</a> (<a href="http://openid.net/pipermail/specs/2007-October/002056.html">http://openid.net/pipermail/specs/2007-October/002056.html</a>)<br><a href="http://openid.net/extensions/sreg/1.1">http://openid.net/extensions/sreg/1.1</a> (<a href="http://openid.net/specs/openid-simple-registration-extension-1_1-01.html">http://openid.net/specs/openid-simple-registration-extension-1_1-01.html</a>)<br>
<a href="http://openid.net/sreg/1.1">http://openid.net/sreg/1.1</a> (<a href="http://openid.net/pipermail/specs/2007-October/002056.html">http://openid.net/pipermail/specs/2007-October/002056.html</a>)<br clear="all"><br>
Thanks.<br><br>-- <br>Andrew Arnott