What's broken is W3C's "culture and vision" that everything in the world should be identified with http: URIs. The idea to use URIs as identifiers that do more than just point to network resources (examples: XML Schema, RDF Resources, OpenID) is stupid in itself.<br>
<br>For normal (non-tech) people it's hard to understand why a string that identifies me or an organization or a book has to start with "http://" or "urn:", or why it has to include ".com".<br>
<br>Besides, URNs aren't very useful because you can't do anything with them.<br><br>XRI's main idea is to keep the identifier separate from the protocol used to discover something about that identifier. URIs don't do that.<br>
<br>Markus<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 12:01 AM, Peter Williams <<a href="mailto:pwilliams@rapattoni.com">pwilliams@rapattoni.com</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
This is old news. Remember oasis is conformed of those who cannot live under the W3c culture and vision of the world. Anything done in oasis is essentially broken, out of the gate.<br>
<div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: Andy Powell <<a href="mailto:andy.powell@eduserv.org.uk">andy.powell@eduserv.org.uk</a>><br>
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 2:07 PM<br>
To: OpenID List <<a href="mailto:general@openid.net">general@openid.net</a>><br>
Subject: [OpenID] W3C TAG recommends against XRI<br>
<br>
In a message to the W3C Technical Architecture Group list yesterday<br>
<br>
<a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2008May/0078.html" target="_blank">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2008May/0078.html</a><br>
<br>
Tim Berners-Lee and Stuart Williams, co-chairs of the TAG state<br>
categorically, "We are not satisfied that XRIs provide functionality not<br>
readily available from http: URIs. Accordingly the TAG recommends<br>
against taking the XRI specifications forward, or supporting the use of<br>
XRIs as identifiers in other specifications".<br>
<br>
Is there a view here about whether this has any impact on the current<br>
adoption of XRI in the OpenID 2.0 spec?<br>
<br>
Andy<br>
--<br>
Head of Development, Eduserv Foundation<br>
<a href="http://www.eduserv.org.uk/foundation/" target="_blank">http://www.eduserv.org.uk/foundation/</a><br>
<a href="http://efoundations.typepad.com/" target="_blank">http://efoundations.typepad.com/</a><br>
<a href="mailto:andy.powell@eduserv.org.uk">andy.powell@eduserv.org.uk</a><br>
+44 (0)1225 474319<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
general mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:general@openid.net">general@openid.net</a><br>
<a href="http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/general" target="_blank">http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/general</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
general mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:general@openid.net">general@openid.net</a><br>
<a href="http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/general" target="_blank">http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/general</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>