<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Noah Slater:
<blockquote cite="mid:20080306194438.GG7412@bytesexual.org" type="cite">
<pre wrap=""><!---->
It's not an assumption, it's bordering on the absurd that I have requote:
RFC 2616 § 10.3.4:
The new uri is not a substitute reference for the originally requested resource.
</pre>
</blockquote>
No, but neither does the "originally requested resource" must be the
claimed_id<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:20080306194438.GG7412@bytesexual.org" type="cite"><br>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
In this specific case, normalising to <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://example.com/">http://example.com/</a> is fine but if this
produces a chain of 302/303/307 redirects to <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://john.example.com/">http://john.example.com/</a> the HTTP
RFC explicitly states that <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://example.com/">http://example.com/</a> is the correct URI.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://john.example.com/">http://john.example.com/</a> is the claimed_id, not a redirect. Of course
one might submit <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://john.example.com/">http://john.example.com/</a> as the claimed_id from the
beginning, but it's not required.
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">Regards </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2"> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Signer: </td>
<td>Eddy Nigg, <a href="http://www.startcom.org">StartCom Ltd.</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jabber: </td>
<td><a href="xmpp:startcom@startcom.org">startcom@startcom.org</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Blog: </td>
<td><a href="http://blog.startcom.org">Join the Revolution!</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Phone: </td>
<td>+1.213.341.0390</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2"> </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</body>
</html>