<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Noah Slater wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:20080305213711.GJ7412@bytesexual.org" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 09:43:59AM -0800, Drummond Reed wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">[=Drummond] I agree, Peter. I think OpenID is adding semantics to HTTP URIs
that do not exist at the HTTP protocol layer.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Of course it is, but that is not a reason to ignore the lower level semantics.
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">[=Drummond] On that, I very much agree. That's why I'm interested in why
Noah feels that, from an OpenID POV, an HTTP redirect does not translated
into an rdf:sameAs statement.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Again, RFC 2616 § 10.3.4
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
Is there a reference for rdf:sameAs? A Google search does not reveal a
Wikipedia page-equivalent :).<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>