<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Peter Williams wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:18498B6C4F691545B050D6A531BA449502C91A44@rapmsg02.rapnt.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hmm. Lets rewrite that and create a compare/contrast situation. Let's
see what information we can infer from the comparison.
As Len Baurie in a piece called "SAML: Phishing Heaven" notes.....
The basic claim in the argument is that openid is crap on the grounds of
the flow.
Does it there follow as true that saml is similarly crap because of it
offers the identical flow?</pre>
</blockquote>
But then one might ask, where is the adoption by the masses of both
openid or saml? Certainly nothing I'm aware of - or better, not many
choose to rely on it, except in a closed relying relation...i.e. I
trust my own delegation point, not that of others.<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">Regards </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2"> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Signer: </td>
<td>Eddy Nigg, <a href="http://www.startcom.org">StartCom Ltd.</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jabber: </td>
<td><a href="xmpp:startcom@startcom.org">startcom@startcom.org</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Blog: </td>
<td><a href="http://blog.startcom.org">Join the Revolution!</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Phone: </td>
<td>+1.213.341.0390</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2"> </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</body>
</html>