+1. I think Interop is a great idea, and I'd be fine if you led things in this area.<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 5/18/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Granqvist, Hans</b> <<a href="mailto:hgranqvist@verisign.com">
hgranqvist@verisign.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">I've previously lead interops and I'll be willing to do the
<br>same for OpenID 2.0 provided:<br><br>* This group votes in majority that interop is needed<br><br>* This group sets up a schedule with deadlines:<br> ** when to freeze 2.0 spec for interop testing,<br> ** when interop scenarios need to be finalized,
<br> ** when interop testing needs to be concluded for 2.0 announcement<br><br> (I think the spec should be frozen < 1 month, with<br> scenarios < 2 months, and final spec < 3 months)<br><br>* There is a place off *.openid.net to keep the documents and
<br> perhaps even running an "<a href="http://interop.openid.net">interop.openid.net</a>" service a la<br> openidenabled.<br><br>* I am joined by at least one more who is passionate about<br> interop and with solid OpenID knowledge (probably most readers
<br> here) ;)<br><br>What you say group? I think the WSS interop (see attached<br>document, unfortunately I could only find a draft at the moment)<br>is a bit more complex than what we need for OpenID, but it's<br>a good example on the level of what I think is needed.
<br><br>-Hans<br><br><br>> -----Original Message-----<br>> From: <a href="mailto:general-bounces@openid.net">general-bounces@openid.net</a><br>> [mailto:<a href="mailto:general-bounces@openid.net">general-bounces@openid.net
</a>] On Behalf Of Recordon, David<br>> Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 11:45 AM<br>> To: Christopher St John; openid-general<br>> Subject: Re: [OpenID] Conformance and Interop,was:Re: JanRain<br>> library licensing (was: Re: On OpenID
2.0)<br>><br>> I'd love to figure out how to get some good interop testing going.<br>> Maybe figuring out some event we can get a majority of<br>> implementers face to face would be a good way to go.<br>>
<br>> --David<br>><br>> -----Original Message-----<br>> From: <a href="mailto:general-bounces@openid.net">general-bounces@openid.net</a><br>> [mailto:<a href="mailto:general-bounces@openid.net">general-bounces@openid.net
</a>] On Behalf Of Christopher St John<br>> Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 1:33 PM<br>> To: openid-general<br>> Subject: [OpenID] Conformance and Interop,was:Re: JanRain<br>> library licensing (was: Re: On OpenID
2.0)<br>><br>> > Personally I think it is "good" for there to be several<br>> > implementations *if* the developers work together to make sure that<br>> > the implementations interoperate.<br>
> ><br>><br>> What's up on the conformance and interop test fronts?<br>> Browsing around the wiki and spec list archives (via google)<br>> didn't turn up much other than an interop endpoint at<br>
> <a href="http://openidenabled.com">openidenabled.com</a>. But I could have easily missed something,<br>> pointers appreciated.<br>><br>> -cks<br>><br>><br>> --<br>> Christopher St. John<br>> <a href="http://artofsystems.blogspot.com">
http://artofsystems.blogspot.com</a><br>> _______________________________________________<br>> general mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:general@openid.net">general@openid.net</a><br>> <a href="http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/general">
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/general</a><br>> _______________________________________________<br>> general mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:general@openid.net">general@openid.net</a><br>> <a href="http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/general">
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/general</a><br>><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>general mailing list<br><a href="mailto:general@openid.net">general@openid.net</a><br><a href="http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/general">
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/general</a><br><br><br></blockquote></div><br>