<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Mark Fowler wrote:
<blockquote
cite="midECBBA49B-BF84-4C84-9CAD-3AF8AFD77707@twoshortplanks.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On 11 Apr 2007, at 10:29, Tan, William wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">May I suggest [section 4 of the spec is altered to] clarify it so
that it reads:
"The keys and values permit the full Unicode character set (UCS). When
the keys and values need to be converted to/from bytes, they MUST
first
be represented in the UTF-8 [RFC3629] and then percent encoded
[RFC3986]."
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->...</pre>
<pre wrap="">
Similarly, should we be also specifying that there either isn't a
BOM, or also stating one is mandatory?
</pre>
</blockquote>
Suggest banning the BOM; if the spec is limited to UTF-8 encoding only,
it would convey no information anyway AFACT.<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
<br>
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/aol/SzHO"><img
src="cid:part1.06020904.01050104@aol.net"
style="border: 0pt none ; float: right;" alt="Abstractioneer"></a>John
Panzer<br>
System Architect<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://abstractioneer.org">http://abstractioneer.org</a><br>
</div>
</body>
</html>