[OpenID] a developers first encounter with account chooser (openid connect?)
Nat Sakimura
sakimura at gmail.com
Thu Oct 18 01:47:03 UTC 2012
I would not speak for Account Chooser. I will let somebody like Eric to do
so.
As far as Connect is concerned, there is a very strong desire to allow
local IdPs including the IdPs that lives on user devices.
Nat
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:59 AM, Peter Williams <home_pw at msn.com> wrote:
> In a word: frustrating. http://wp.me/p1fcz8-2YW. It was frustrating on
> multiple levels, some of them political, some about clearly over zealous
> monitoring of RP matters, and some due to and obvious lack of willingness
> to listen to mature RP communities and their requirements for adoption.
> But, whats new.
>
> Obviously the code is fixable, but one worries about the very "idea" -
> there seems a desperation in the desire to remove local IDPs - including
> those granting access to privileged administrator configuring (broken)
> federated logon!
>
> To be fair, the default Microsoft ASP.NET web app project built by the
> released version of visual studio 20102 doesn't work, either - when taking
> up the federated (OAUTH/openid) login option and its display of a set of
> IDPs, configured locally. It doesn't even compile, link and load! Thus, I
> have not even so far as work with its attempt to showcase Openid Connect,
> or see if things interwork yet with Google's implementation, etc.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> general at lists.openid.net
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-general
>
>
--
Nat Sakimura (=nat)
Chairman, OpenID Foundation
http://nat.sakimura.org/
@_nat_en
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-general/attachments/20121018/8f793a76/attachment.html>
More information about the general
mailing list