[OpenID] Google+ and Unique Identifiers -- different again?

[Arthur Goldberg]

email addresses are the only practical identifier now

On 7/2/11 1:12 AM, Allen Tom wrote:
> Email addresss were and are the one true identifier!
>
> All kidding aside (well, maybe I'm not really really kidding) - there
> will be a migration path in OpenID connect, so  if Google Plus
> supports OpenID Connect, perhaps both the new G+ identifier and the
> existing OpenID 2.0 identifier will be returned in the assertion.
>
> Allen
>
> On Friday, July 1, 2011, Johannes Ernst<jernst+openid.net at netmesh.us>  wrote:
> > It seems Google has changed their unique identifiers for people again.
> >
> > Apparently I'm now:
> >         https://plus.google.com/104555285104903729468
> > as opposed to
> >         http://profiles.google.com/Johannes.Ernst
> > and so many other variations over the years.
> >
> > My relying party implementation does not recognize me any more
> although I use the same URL as identifier. Which means I can't access
> my account!
> >
> > Is it me who is doing something wrong here? What's the official
> Google migration path?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >
> >
> > Johannes.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > general mailing list
> > general at lists.openid.net
> > http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-general
> >
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> general at lists.openid.net
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-general

-- 
Senior Research Scientist
Computational Biology
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
cBio Cancer Genomics Portal <http://www.cbioportal.org/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-general/attachments/20110702/382c762e/attachment.html>