[OpenID] [foaf-protocols] Lack of browser support

[SitG Admin]

>That seems a bit complicated, though perhaps it could work. Better 
>would be to use access control, so that relying parties that 
>identified themselves could have access to the private foaf.

Relying parties need to be able to authenticate themselves to the 
FOAF host, then; this seems unlikely to happen, unless anonymous RP's 
come into style or users start hosting their own RP/FOAF on their 
cellphones (and by the time they do *that*, I think the 
infrastructure will be present to *let* them do it).

-Shade