[OpenID] Feedback requested: New OpenID RP login UX prototype
Rabbit
rabbit at cyberpunkrock.com
Fri Oct 23 05:15:19 UTC 2009
Inline comments.
Peace.
=Rabbit
On Oct 22, 2009, at 10:27 PM, Andrew Arnott wrote:
> Thanks, Rabbit.
>
> Responses inline.
> --
> Andrew Arnott
> "I [may] not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the
> death your right to say it." - S. G. Tallentyre
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Rabbit <rabbit at cyberpunkrock.com>
> wrote:
> I won't sugar coat this. If I encountered this interface in the wild
> I would be furious. I hope you are able to take this criticism
> constructively and improve the user experience.
> Sure, I don't want you to sugar coat it. Although your tone
> throughout this email suggests that you thought I thought this was
> all finished and polished. It's a "prototype", dude.
I know it's a prototype. Apologies for my tone.
>
> FireFox on OSX receives multiple plugin download requests. Obviously
> these are related to InfoCard but "explainable" from a technical
> perspective doesn't translate to "acceptable" from a user
> perspective. There was also no indication as to what the plugins
> were for and when I attempted to install them it failed. That latter
> criticism may be an issue with FireFox or OSX.
>
> I totally agree. This doesn't happen on Windows, so I didn't see
> these problems. But another mac user reported seeing the same
> thing. I have an idea of how to fix this so please try again in a
> couple days and tell me if the problem hasn't gone away. Yes, it's
> InfoCard related, but it was not my intention to throw up all kinds
> of unpleasantness for those who don't have InfoCard support. It's
> supposed to be a very quiet "light-up" scenario if you have it, and
> completely and quietly missing if you don't.
Realistically, it's not a big deal. In FireFox it appears as a slide
down bar the same that happens when asked to remember a password. I
don't know enough about integrating with InfoCard, the reason I
pointed it out is that there may be some Mozilla-oriented headers that
will point its plugin searcher in the right direction.
>
>
> Almost every popup window was irritating and appeared broken. A
> standard user would most likely think they were tricked into
> clicking an advertisement. This somewhat extends into my general
> criticism towards the entire popup standard being promoted (which I
> won't get into) but even with the popup approach there is room for
> improvement here. If you know the OpenID provider you are sending me
> to, and they do not offer a simple UI for popups, at least size the
> window to avoid horizontal scrollbars.
>
> http://s978.photobucket.com/albums/ae262/rabbyte/?action=view¤t=Picture3.png
> http://s978.photobucket.com/albums/ae262/rabbyte/?action=view¤t=Picture4.png
> http://s978.photobucket.com/albums/ae262/rabbyte/?action=view¤t=Picture5.png
>
> Working within the popup UI is still being developed for the OPs,
> and each of them are responsible for making it look good. Google
> supports it fully, as I'm sure you noticed. Yahoo claims to support
> it but don't get the window size right according to the UI extension
> draft spec and I hope they fix that or the spec (I don't care
> which). myopenid and verisign don't support it at all, and the
> larger popup window size I give non-supporters isn't apparently big
> enough for their large window demands. I'll see if I can fix that
> by just giving them a bigger window. Ideally, I hope this
> encourages these OPs to shrink their UI so it fits in smaller windows.
imho, I would prefer a new tab being opened if there is no known
window dimensions. Unfortunately, that creates an even more
inconsistent user experience.
>
> Besides that, myopenid and Verisign aren't likely to be displayed in
> the final UI kit that I'm building until they meet the guidelines I
> wrote up. RPs can always add them though.
>
>
> You'll also notice that the MyOpenID popup is slightly hiding its
> security feature on the top right. There's just no excuse for that.
>
> I agree. But see above.
>
> The automatic redirecting is absolutely atrocious! Even just trying
> to test this out for feedback was excruciating. It is impossible to
> change my choice once I have made a choice. Page load tries to
> redirect. Clicking login tries to redirect. My history gets mangled
> and I can't hit the back button. Between the popups and the
> redirects, a standard user might (and should) think they have a virus.
>
> Now here you've lost me. Can you explain more precisely what's
> going on? Maybe it's a Mac thing (which I would of course still
> want to fix), but why do you say it's impossible to change your
> choice once you've made one? If you click one Provider and log in,
> you absolutely can pick another provider the next time you log in
> (although we make them appear grayer than the rest to discourage
> this). But remember this is targeted at normal users -- it's not
> targeted for testing multiple OPs. So a normal user would want to
> keep clicking the same button in order to avoid splintering their
> identity. That's a common complaint about OpenID: "Which button did
> I click on last time?" Or more practically: "I logged in [with the
> wrong button] and now all my stuff is gone!" Although the other
> buttons are gray, you can still click them.
I thought that was an intentional feature. I made a provider choice,
clicked through to the provider, did not login (maybe that makes the
difference?), went back to the original page and each time it would
load for a second then instantly redirect me back to the OP I chose.
I had to load your page, hit stop quickly, click Login, hit stop
quickly, then choose another provider. (You can understand my
frustration! hah)
I wouldn't mind the auto-redirects if there were a visual countdown
such as:
"You previously chose X as your provider. Redirecting in
3....2....1..." with a cancel button to make another choice.
I don't really see how this could be an OS-specific issue. If you have
trouble duplicating this, contact me directly, I'll try to help
pinpoint it.
>
> Now what about this "page load tries to redirect". What does that
> mean? I've seen sites where the Back button takes you to a page
> that redirects you "forward" again, which is very aggravating. But
> on my browsers, this doesn't happen. The back button works as
> expected. Can you elaborate about what's broken?
>
> It also wouldn't hurt to provide a little information about OpenID
> since it is an option. Even linking to a tutorial site to provide
> more information would be helpful (hey! and you could use another
> popup!). Ok, maybe that last remark was a little mean. I appreciate
> the effort. I really need to put together a demo. I really hope you
> found my feedback useful.
>
> Here I disagree with you, but your opinion is appreciated
> nonetheless. This is not a "promote OpenID" design. Some of the
> loudest feedback I hear from users who fail to log into RPs is that
> they don't know what OpenID is and they leave. This UI is designed
> for maximum user conversions to the RP's services, not to OpenID.
> RPs want users to log in -- they don't care whether users know what
> OpenID is, and users don't visit random RPs to learn about what
> OpenID is.
>
I only suggested it as OpenID is an option. It don't think it would
hurt since you're already expanding the window with an input field to
have a small link saying "What is this?" After all, that could easily
be a path of discovery for many people who just haven't heard of
OpenID yet but would love if they understood it.
> A design requirement is to keep the UI as simple as possible, while
> providing flexibility where needed for power users. So links to
> learn about OpenID will be limited to what the RP's attorneys insist
> on saying for liability reasons.
>
> Yes, your feedback was helpful -- and can be more so if you can
> provide some more detail about the issues I asked for more detail
> about.
>
> =Rabbit
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-general/attachments/20091023/08e16aa6/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the general
mailing list