[OpenID] Open Challenge to webfinger and XRD

[David Recordon]

What are the Section 508 implications of selecting said colors?

On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 8:50 AM, John Bradley <ve7jtb at ve7jtb.com> wrote:

> If we are going that way I prefer CYMK.  However we need to remember that
> open standards cannot represent Panatone 185.
>
> Perhaps we need to start up a WG to properly study the colour issue.
>
> John B.
>
>
>
> On 2009-10-21, at 12:26 PM, Leon P. Kuunders wrote:
>
>  It would be logical to just use RGB formatting. Isn't that universal?
>>
>> ------Original Message------
>> From: SitG Admin
>> Sender: openid-general-bounces at lists.openid.net
>> To: John Bradley
>> Cc: openid-general at lists.openid.net
>> Subject: Re: [OpenID] Open Challenge to webfinger and XRD
>> Sent: Oct 21, 2009 17:07
>>
>>  Is it possible to represent colour in SAML?
>>>
>>
>> Should we have different values per system of spelling ('color' for
>> Americans', 'colour' for Europeans) to ensure ethnic flexibility? Or
>> perhaps keep things easier for developers (not to mention retaining
>> interoperability) by settling on a single word that everyone can
>> agree to disagree on? I propose that we achieve compromise by
>> creating a spelling that *noone* thinks is correct: that way,
>> *everyone* will be unhappy (and thus equal) :)
>>
>> -Shade
>> _______________________________________________
>> general mailing list
>> general at lists.openid.net
>> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-general
>>
>>
>> Groet!
>>
>> Leon P. Kuunders
>> M: +31 6411 64 995
>> _______________________________________________
>> general mailing list
>> general at lists.openid.net
>> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-general
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> general at lists.openid.net
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-general
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-general/attachments/20091021/cbf6962f/attachment.htm>