[OpenID] Open Challenge to webfinger and XRD

[John Bradley]

If we are going that way I prefer CYMK.  However we need to remember  
that open standards cannot represent Panatone 185.

Perhaps we need to start up a WG to properly study the colour issue.

John B.


On 2009-10-21, at 12:26 PM, Leon P. Kuunders wrote:

> It would be logical to just use RGB formatting. Isn't that universal?
>
> ------Original Message------
> From: SitG Admin
> Sender: openid-general-bounces at lists.openid.net
> To: John Bradley
> Cc: openid-general at lists.openid.net
> Subject: Re: [OpenID] Open Challenge to webfinger and XRD
> Sent: Oct 21, 2009 17:07
>
>> Is it possible to represent colour in SAML?
>
> Should we have different values per system of spelling ('color' for
> Americans', 'colour' for Europeans) to ensure ethnic flexibility? Or
> perhaps keep things easier for developers (not to mention retaining
> interoperability) by settling on a single word that everyone can
> agree to disagree on? I propose that we achieve compromise by
> creating a spelling that *noone* thinks is correct: that way,
> *everyone* will be unhappy (and thus equal) :)
>
> -Shade
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> general at lists.openid.net
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-general
>
>
> Groet!
>
> Leon P. Kuunders
> M: +31 6411 64 995
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> general at lists.openid.net
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-general

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2468 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-general/attachments/20091021/7a89c437/attachment.bin>