[OpenID] Open Challenge to webfinger and XRD

[Drummond Reed]

I will absolutely NOT be a part of this bikeshed unless it is red.

Red red red red!

;-)

On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Johannes Ernst <jernst+openid.net@
netmesh.us> wrote:

> I'm sorry, but blue is totally out of the question. It has mood
> connotations, and I don't think these particular ones are conceivable in the
> particular context of this particular discussion ;-)
>
>
> On Oct 20, 2009, at 21:04, John Panzer wrote:
>
>  Without opining on the merits of the various ways of specifying a DNS
>> subject: If an http uri plus standard fragment is adopted, I propose
>> that the fragment be #bikeshed-color-blue.
>>
>> On Tuesday, October 20, 2009, SitG Admin
>> <sysadmin at shadowsinthegarden.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> So now I want to post my grouse no (2) with XRD.  The idea that the
>>> <Subject> of an XRD can be implicit or "0" is a BAD BAD BAD Idea!!
>>>
>>>
>>> Huh. Funny you should say that. I was just thinking that following this
>>> thread might become dissuadingly confusing with the subject line identical
>>> across an unknown (but growing) number of actual discussions by its
>>> (implicit) description. Mind appending the grouse of a particular post to
>>> its subject line so we have some idea before reading it of what everyone is
>>> talking about?
>>>
>>> -Shade
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> general mailing list
>>> general at lists.openid.net
>>> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-general
>>>
>>>  _______________________________________________
>> general mailing list
>> general at lists.openid.net
>> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-general
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> general at lists.openid.net
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-general
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-general/attachments/20091021/a52f65ea/attachment.htm>