[OpenID] OpenID Summit on Monday November 2nd @ Yahoo HQ

[Nat Sakimura]

Indeed. And analysis on why some people feel OpenID is dead, etc. is
important as well.
On other topics, "OpenID 2.1" is a bit big.
Currently there are several components in it, e.g., Artifact, Discovery,
Signature, etc. and
feel that we need more time allocated for it.

=nat

On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Johannes Ernst <jernst+openid.net@
netmesh.us> wrote:

> The difficulties with directed identity:
>
>  From: Johannes Ernst <jernst+google.com at netmesh.us>
>>
>
> That's not the persona I meant to use and that's why it didn't show up on
> the list. But thanks to Allen's prompt answer, no need to repost.
>
> Agenda sounds excellent so far. In addition, it might be a good idea for
> somebody who feels confident to do that to summarize, at the beginning of
> the meeting, what we've accomplished so far in OpenID land, and where we are
> going. It might inform the direction of the discussion and provide a larger
> map. In the worst case, it will spark disagreements, which would be a good
> thing, too, if there are any.
>
>
>
>
> n Oct 15, 2009, at 19:34, Allen Tom wrote:
>
>  Hi Johannes -
>>
>> There's a proposed agenda posted on the Eventbrite site.
>>
>> http://openid.eventbrite.com/
>>
>> I definitely would appreciate some help with fleshing out the agenda and
>> topics.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Allen
>>
>>
>> Johannes Ernst wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Allen for putting this together.
>>>
>>> Is there an agenda or at least a set of subjects to discuss?
>>>
>>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> general at lists.openid.net
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-general
>



-- 
Nat Sakimura (=nat)
http://www.sakimura.org/en/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-general/attachments/20091020/2161dcff/attachment.htm>