[OpenID] Should Openid's resolve to their descriptors in v.next?
SitG Admin
sysadmin at shadowsinthegarden.com
Thu Nov 19 23:43:39 UTC 2009
>Next is OpenID 1.0. According to which John's OpenID resolves to his
>html homepage, which will contain his resource descriptor
>information.
Keep in mind that anything suggested for 1.0 (such as upgrading to
1.1) will fail for those users who already have 1.0 working, and lack
the time/skill/inclination to make any changes to it. Legacy support
is still important, here - don't make any suggestions that would
break it.
>Then we have directed identity, which resolves to nothing really,
>other that some "BIG EGOS". This should be dumped, and we should
>assuage the big ego's with an acct: URI. Which is actually fair.
You mean that instead of the average user learning to type in
"google.com", they must learn to type in "accnt://google.com"? Even
if I had a blinking cursor placed right after a prefilled "acct://",
my first reaction (as an average user) would *still* be
counterproductive: it would probably be to delete all that scary
meaningless code stuff, and put in "google.com" (which actually makes
sense to non-programmers).
-Shade
More information about the general
mailing list