[OpenID] OpenID Security Issues
Allen Tom
atom at yahoo-inc.com
Sun Nov 15 18:15:13 UTC 2009
Hi Ashish,
I updated the OpenID wiki with links to the openidreview Google docs site.
From a specs perspective, do you have an opinion as to which issues
should be addressed in the next 6 months?
Obviously some issues probably can never be resolved via an OpenID spec,
for instance CSRF/XSS on either the OP or RP is a problem that is much
broader than just OpenID.
I think Session Swapping issue should probably be resolved in the spec,
as it's very similar to Login CSRF for sites that authenticate users
with a username/password.
I believe that the Replay Attacks scenario could probably be resolved by
the Artifact Binding working group.
The Diffie-Hellman issue is already in scope for OpenID 2.1. (I'm in
favor for removing DH)
http://wiki.openid.net/OpenID_Authentication_2_1
Thoughts?
Allen
Ashish Jain wrote:
> Allen,
> Here is a link to some more description around the issues:
> https://sites.google.com/site/openidreview/issues
>
> Here is a link to the resources/papers that we mentioned:
> https://sites.google.com/site/openidreview/resources
>
> I haven't been able to find notes from Breno's IIW session. Here is a
> link to the whiteboard picture:
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/_nat/4075945912/
>
> Thanks,
> -Ashish
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Allen Tom <atom at yahoo-inc.com
> <mailto:atom at yahoo-inc.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> There were several security discussions last week at the OpenID
> Summit and IIW, and it's about time that we follow up on them:
>
> For those of you who weren't able to attend last week, some of the
> presos are here:
> http://wiki.openid.net/OpenIDSummit2009
>
> And I started a wiki here:
> http://wiki.openid.net/SecurityIssues
>
> A new issue (at least to me) is the Session Swapping issue
> reported by Ashish Jain, Andrew Nash, and Jeff Hodges of PayPal. A
> potential solution is to have the RP do something similar to a
> checkid_immediate request after receiving an assertion. This would
> allow the RP and OP to confirm that the assertion was actually
> issued by the OP to the user that's trying to authenticate at the
> RP, at the cost of another round trip.
>
> Another issue that's always discussed is Phishing. While I don't
> think we will completely solve the phishing problem in the near
> future, there are things that we can do now to help protect users
> from phishing. The client side OpenID selectors that were demoed
> last week can potentially improve both usability and security for
> users who have them installed.
>
> Some applications have issues with OpenID assertions being
> transmitted unencrypted via the user's browser. I believe that the
> Artifact Binding WG will try to address this issue.
>
> Anything else? It looks like there's consensus that Single Sign
> Out should be deferred for the time being.
>
> Allen
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> general at lists.openid.net <mailto:general at lists.openid.net>
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-general
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-general/attachments/20091115/0ce150fa/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the general
mailing list