[OpenID] [xri-comment] My Feedback for XRD Vrsion 1.0

[SitG Admin]

>>>What I have proven here is that the
>>
>>You did? I must have missed that. Were you referring to this?
>>
>>>I will rewrite the definition of an XRD.
>>
>>Asserting that you are going to change the definition is not the 
>>same as proving that the new definition is true.
>
>This is no about what "I said" or "You said" or "he said".

You can't escape the realities of who said what as easily as 
releasing a declaration. (Well, that seems to be the extent of your 
actions against other inconveniences, so perhaps you really do think 
that's how it works.) The meaning that you assert is "proven" - HOW 
was it proven? Whose definitions support your assertion?

(Those are two separate questions - we'll generally lend greater 
weight to reason, even anonymous, than reputation. But if you can't 
provide adequate evidence from either, we'll probably reject your 
assertion that there IS proof.)

>This is about a developing story.

And every time you act upon that story, you create reality anew, 
leaving the rest of us to just study it? ;)

>What is right, what is wrong, what is gonna break, what is not gonna 
>break, history will answer.

If you'd rather let history answer it, then don't expect us to react 
as if you're comparing bikeshed-walls-wood to 
bikeshed-walls-tissue-paper.

-Shade