[OpenID] host-meta and "acct:"

[Santosh Rajan]

Hehe SitG, why didnt you answer the rest of the questions? You didn't even
copy them. Jumped the gun heh??

On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 8:58 PM, SitG Admin
<sysadmin at shadowsinthegarden.com>wrote:

> Why are you guys so stuck up on allowing XRD's with no Subject?
>>
>
> Well, actually, that's already the plan; so, the onus is on *you*, then, as
> the person with a new idea, to explain why it should be otherwise. So, why
> are YOU so stuck up?
>
>
>  If you really want to do that, why don't you allow for an "Anonymous XRD"
>> who's Subject is empty?
>>
>
> Why require all XRD's to have a Subject field, if it can be empty? Can't it
> just be omitted entirely, saving bandwidth from transmitting an extra 19
> (plus whitespace) bytes?
>
> If it can be empty, it can be omitted - as I've said before, the lack of a
> field can implicitly be taken as the emptiness of a field.
>
> -Shade
>



-- 
http://hi.im/santosh
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-general/attachments/20091104/3c1226a6/attachment.htm>