[OpenID] allowing users to switch to opendid-only: pointless?
Martin Atkins
mart at degeneration.co.uk
Thu May 28 23:07:22 UTC 2009
Nicolas Holzapfel wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm in the processing of designing a big social networking type site and
> was just dealing with the account management settings. I'm working with
> someone else and we both want to make the site as openid-friendly as
> possible. Users will be able to sign up and log in using openid and
> similar services like Facebook Connect, Google Connect etc and associate
> multiple external website with the same account (i.e. they can use
> myOpenID, Facebook Connect and their site-specific username/password to
> log into the same, single account).
>
> In addition, I proposed allowing users who originally signed up with a
> site-specific username/password, then associated their account with (for
> example) a myOpenID account, to delete their original site-specific
> password so that they would only be able to log in with myOpenID. To me,
> this makes sense because the user then has one less password to worry
> about and keep track of. However, to my co-designer, only crazy people
> would want such a feature since the user can just stop using their
> original password if they wish.
>
> I would be very interested in knowing what you lot think about this.
>
One way to think about this is that by retaining a local password you
essentially defeat any better-than-passwords authentication mechanism
that the OP is using by offering a backdoor that side-steps the OP.
As long as most users are using passwords to authenticate to the OP this
isn't really a compelling argument, of course. (And, if we're honest,
most users probably used the same password at their OP and at your site.)
More information about the general
mailing list