[OpenID] A Case for OpenEmailID
Martin Atkins
mart at degeneration.co.uk
Mon May 4 21:13:18 UTC 2009
David Recordon wrote:
> Right, but my argument was that you could delegate all of
> degeneration.co.uk to a Provider but not delegate
> mart at degeneration.co.uk to Provider A and bob at degeneration.co.uk to
> Provider B.
>
Perhaps, but delegation in the URL model is delegation to an OP-local
identifier, not to a provider.
So I would have to associate the whole of my domain with a single
OP-local identifier, not just with a provider.
What makes supporting separate settings for each user so difficult? My
old DNS-based email discovery prototype had no trouble doing this, but
I'm not familiar enough with this new proposal to understand why/whether
discovery on the whole email address is difficult.
I think it's preferable to retain feature-parity between email-based and
URL-based identifiers, including doing the discovery based on the entire
address rather than just the authority part.
More information about the general
mailing list