[OpenID] Fwd: [OpenID Foundation] New Poll Opened

[Breno de Medeiros]

Sure, and I just intended my remark to remind all how we got here and how
minimal the proposal really is.

On Mar 20, 2009 7:39 PM, "Peter Williams" <pwilliams at rapattoni.com> wrote:

 A debate on a WG formation (note the subject) should be philosophical (and
a touch political). One is really analyzing the intended output, and the
stated motives and  background of the proponents. Since the work has not
been done, there is nothing else to comment on – other than the charter.



Try not to assume malice; it’s almost always incompetence for my part. I
have two callings: get google to do websso for “consumers” and send  us
assertions I can consume (without becoming bound to legal/policy rules that
my customers will reject), and let 1,000,000 realtors be their own OP and
their own RP. I need both peer-peer and openid.



As it stands today, we are doing SAML for the realtors (more peer peer, with
very personal brands/trust), and hoping to do openid for the consumers (more
about mega-portal with massive commercial brands and reach)





*From:* Breno de Medeiros [mailto:breno at google.com]
*Sent:* Friday, March 20, 2009 7:14 PM
*To:* Peter Williams
*Cc:* general at openid.net

Subject: Re: [OpenID] Fwd: [OpenID Foundation] New Poll Opened

  It is interesting how a discussion on a relatively simple extension
proposal which was motivate...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-general/attachments/20090320/280d07b4/attachment-0002.htm>