[OpenID] Question about voting

[Dave Kearns]

Are you being deliberately obtuse?

-dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: general-bounces at openid.net [mailto:general-bounces at openid.net]On
> Behalf Of Santosh Rajan
> Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 7:35 PM
> To: general at openid.net
> Subject: [OpenID] Question about voting
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks to responses from board members things are more clear to 
> me. However
> that leaves me with a couple of questions. First this is what I 
> understood.
> 1. Voting is beyond the pervue of the board as suggested 
> http://www.nabble.com/Fwd:--board-private--FW:--OpenID--Authorized
> -Voting-for-Email-Like-Identifiers-to23949301.html
> here . Working group is what is required.
> 2. Consensus is what is required instead of voting as suggested 
> by one board
> member by quoting the following. “We reject: kings, presidents and voting.
> We believe in: rough consensus and running code.”
> 
> My questions is
> 1) How come we need to vote for a working group?
> 2) How come we need to vote for community board members?
> Can't all this be done by consensus?
> 
> -----
> 
> Santosh Rajan
> http://santrajan.blogspot.com http://santrajan.blogspot.com 
> -- 
> View this message in context: 
> http://www.nabble.com/Question-about-voting-tp23954661p23954661.html
> Sent from the OpenID - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> general at openid.net
> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/general
>